Police officers are an incredible and significant line of defense for our cities and surrounding communities. But sometimes, just as any person in any vocation, cops can make poor choices that result in serious penalties. For instance, using their registered weapons inappropriately. While on-duty, cops are faced with the difficult decision to use their weapons for defense and public safety, including flashlights, nightsticks, Tasers, and of course, firearms.

And how the officer chooses to use their weapons greatly depends on the actions of the suspect or suspects. However, there have been cases where an officer is accused of using their weapons in excess, resulting in unreasonable injury to a person. In these kinds of cases, the question of reasonability commonly arises, as well as, the whether or not the officer should receive a penalty for their actions. One such question arose in the small town of Peru, Indiana, involving a cop, a taser, and an elderly nursing home patient. Continue reading to learn what happened.

PERU CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and City of Peru v. Gregory MARTIN

No. 52A02–1304–PL–350. Decided: September 03, 2013

In 2012, a Peru City police officer by the name of Gregory Martin was dispatched to Miller’s Merry Manor after a call to 911 was made by a nurse named Adam Chambers. Chambers made the call to request assistance transporting a combative patient to the hospital. The patient was James Howard, a 64 year old Alzheimer’s patient. Upon arrival, Officer Martin was joined by Officer Jeremy Brindle, and they were then escorted to the locked Alzheimer’s ward section of the facility.

After asking staff to stay back and not intervene, the officers entered Mr. Howard’s room and found him sitting in a chair unclothed, and staring straight ahead. As the officers moved in closer, they ordered Mr. Howard to get on the gurney, but he did not obey the order. Instead, Mr. Howard began “shuffling” toward Officer Brindle with his fists clenched at his sides. Officer Brindle was cornered in a T-section hallway as he tried to grab Mr. Howard’s wrists and handcuff him. Unable to do so, Officer Martin then yelled, “Taser!” and deployed his onto Mr. Howard’s torso. Mr. Howard fell on the floor and laid on his back. He would still not comply with the officer’s commands, and turned over on his belly so he could not be handcuffed. As a result, Officer Martin ended up using the Taser on Mr. Howard 5 times, equaling a deployment of 31 seconds total.

After being admitted to the hospital, Mr. Howard’s injuries were documented, including a black eye, bruising, skin abrasions, and marks on his side. His wife was not pleased with the treatment he received by the officers on call. And for this, she filed a complaint with the Peru City Police Department for excessive use of a taser. An internal investigation followed, putting Officer Martin on administrative leave. The Peru City Police Chief, Chief Hoover, recommended Officer Martin’s termination after deciding he used excessive force with the Alzheimer’s patient. The City of Peru Board of Public Works and Safety conducted a hearing and agreed with Chief Hoover, so Officer Martin was discharged and sought review in the trial court.

After reviewing Officer Martin’s Taser training that specifically teaches that Taser exposure for over 15 seconds, whether due to multiple applications or a continuous one, increases the risk of death or serious injury. The panel concluded, “Substantial evidence supports the Board’s findings, and its decision to terminate Martin for use of excessive force and conduct unbecoming of an officer was not arbitrary and capricious.” He was fired.

Learn the Facts First

When it comes to brushes with law enforcement, every situation is unique and requires a detailed look at the individual merits involved. For this reason, it is best to discuss your questions, concerns, and criminal charges with an experienced criminal defense attorney who can provide specific information regarding your individual circumstances. Contact David E. Lewis, Attorney at Law, at 317-636-7514 for experienced Indianapolis criminal defense you can trust.