Why You Never Waive Your Right to an Attorney

Indiana Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

Indiana Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

When you are arrested as a suspect in a crime, before you are even officially charged your first priority should be to contact a licensed and experienced criminal defense attorney. Being charged with a crime is a very serious matter, regardless of the severity of charges or penalties. Whether you are caught shoplifting a stick of gum or driving while intoxicated, a criminal record is a serious matter that requires adept legal representation.

A lawyer has the skills, resources, and professional connections to work the best possible defense against your charges in order to protect your rights and preserving your freedoms. If you want to avoid the maximum penalties for your criminal charges, you need an attorney.

Public Defense

Although you have the option of choosing a public defender, who are also real lawyers, there are numerous downfalls for going that route. There are monumental differences between a public defender and a criminal defense attorney, and several advantages in using private counsel rather than public defense. But having legal representation either way is important, so be sure to never waive your right to an attorney if you are charged with a crime.

You Can’t Represent Yourself

Indiana Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

Indiana Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

Thinking you can represent yourself in your criminal case is a major misconception. Anyone who does not professionally practice criminal defense is incapable of representing a criminal case successfully. There are various complexities involved, all of which vary themselves depending on the individual circumstances of the case. So taking the risk of waiving your right to counsel and losing your case can render severe short term consequences, but also ones that follow you throughout your entire life.

Criminal Charges Come With a Criminal Record

Criminal charges don’t just come with a list of penalties, like possible jail time, hefty fines, court fees, filing costs, probation, community service, suspended drivers’ license, and random drug screening. Criminal charges come with a permanent record. And a criminal record, regardless of its severity, can hold a person back from several opportunities in life, including viable employment, promotions, professional licenses, home ownership, proprietorship, governmental clearances, and much more. It can even implicate a couple’s ability to adopt a child. So it is important to handle a criminal charge it the most aggressive and sure-fire way, and that is to always take advantage of your right to hire an attorney. Never waive your right to counsel.

Indianapolis Criminal Defense

David E. Lewis Attorney at Law

David E. Lewis Attorney at Law 317-636-7514

Call David E. Lewis, Attorney at Law, at 317-636-7514 if you are facing criminal charges in Indianapolis, Indiana. He is a licensed and aggressive criminal defense lawyer that will stop at nothing to protect your rights and preserve your freedoms, regardless of the crimes you are charged with. Our Indianapolis criminal defense law firm offers free initial consultations to discuss your case and the possible strategies for defense. Call 317-636-7514 to get started on yours, today.

Common Internet Crimes and Penalties

Indiana Cyber Crime Attorney 317-636-7514

Indiana Cyber Crime Attorney 317-636-7514

Internet crime, also known as cybercrime or computer crime, is an increasing threat across America. Cybercrimes are criminal offenses conducted using modern telecommunication networks, namely the internet and mobile phones. They are classified as offenses committed directly or indirectly against a person or group of people with a criminal motive to purposefully cause the victim harm or loss. This includes physical harm, mental harm, and harm to one’s reputation, as well as, losses such as money, assets, companionship, employment, security, and more. They are serious crimes that come with serious penalties.

Continue reading to learn some common types of internet crimes and the penalties offenders can face for committing them.

Cybercrime

There are various types of cybercrimes, and even more ways to commit them. And we’re not talking about illegally downloading movies and music; although these are common internet infractions as well, they tend to render little to no consequences except personal ethical remorse. We are discussing the more serious types of internet crimes; the ones that come with serious penalties here in Indiana. The most common types of cybercrimes that occur in the Hoosier state include but are not limited to:

Fraud Fraud on the internet can come in many forms. A common example is obtaining money or property under false pretenses or promises. For instance, selling false or non-existent merchandise online, and failing to deliver.

Identity Theft Identity theft is one of the most frustrating and devastating crimes for victims. A common example of identity theft is when a person uses another person’s personal information to open and utilize bank accounts and credit lines. Other identity thieves steal individual’s bank account numbers, credit and debit card numbers, social security numbers, and more. They either sell this information or they use it themselves for financial gain. It can ruin a person’s reputation and credit score for life.

Hacking Accessing a person’s personal information for the purpose of malicious destruction or commercial advantage via the internet is a form of hacking, but the versions you see in the movies and on television are quite accurate as well. There are many forms of hacking (business accounts, social media profiles, email, corporate files, government databases, websites, etc.), but fundamentally, hackers illegally access information online using illegal methods.

Stalking Internet stalking is a crime. It can come in the form of harassment, pestering, bullying, threats, slander, libel, and more. It is most common among youths.

Extortion/Blackmail There are also many forms of extortion, but in terms of cybercrime, it can occur when a person blackmails another person via a modern telecommunications network. For instance, a person could threaten to release embarrassing photos or information about another person unless they give them money, assets, promotions, or something else of value.

Sports Betting Online sports betting and wagering is a federal crime. There are laws surrounding non-sports online betting and internet gambling that vary state to state, but wagering on sports on the internet is illegal.

The Indiana Cyber Crime Unit

Indiana Cyber Crime Attorney 317-636-7514

Indiana Cyber Crime Attorney 317-636-7514

In May of 1998, Indiana formed the Cyber Crime Unit to provide law enforcement assistance in internet criminal investigations. Within this specialized unit are 6 sergeants who conduct forensic retrieval of digital evidence, and over 28 trained digital media specialists. They are trained to be on the constant look-out for internet criminal activity. This makes it extremely difficult (if not virtually impossible) for anyone to get away with cybercrime in Indiana. If you are caught committing a cybercrime, you can expect to face some stern charges and penalties.

Penalties for Cybercrime

The penalties for cybercrime vary, and they depend on several factors, including the severity of the crime, the offender’s criminal history, local ordinances, age of offender, and more. In Indiana, cybercrime can earn an offender anywhere from 6 months to 20 years in prison, and up to $10,000 in fines. This does not include court fees, attorney fees, filing fees, and more. It is important to retain the services of an experienced Indianapolis criminal defense attorney to protect your rights as a suspected offender and to protect your freedoms.

Indianapolis Criminal Defense

David E. Lewis Attorney at Law

David E. Lewis Attorney at Law 317-636-7514

Call Attorney David E. Lewis at 317-636-7514 if you are facing charges for cybercrime in Indiana. Our law firm works around the clock to ensure your rights are protected. Attorney David E. Lewis has extensive trial and litigation experience and is the aggressive criminal defense lawyer you need in your corner when facing serious criminal charges in Indiana. Call 317-636-7514 to set up a free initial consultation to discuss your criminal case and determine the best strategy for your defense.

How to Seal Your Arrest Record After a Diversion Agreement

Seal Arrest Records 317-636-7514

Seal Arrest Records 317-636-7514

Minor arrests that do not result in criminal charges are rare but not uncommon in Indiana. Infractions like public intoxication, for example, are generally dealt with by arresting the offender and placing them in a holding cell, colloquially known as the “drunk tank”, and then released without being charged with a crime once they are sober. This is intended to keep citizens safe from themselves and others when overly-intoxicated and behaving alarmingly in public.

In other cases, offenders are not so lucky. But many are given the chance to enter a diversion agreement in place of stricter penalties and jail time if their offense did not involve aggressive conduct.

Diversion Agreements

A diversion agreement is a contract that is generally negotiated between the prosecutor and the criminal defender. The agreement allows the charges to be dismissed after one year if the defendant meets certain criteria. Criteria mostly includes refraining from criminal activity and arrests, as well as, not violating probation or any mandatory court orders. This is a great program for first-time offenders who are caught committing a minor crime or infraction. It gives them a second chance. But even though charges are dropped at the conclusion of the year, the arrest will still linger on their permanent record.

Arrest Records

Seal Arrest Records 317-636-7514

Seal Arrest Records 317-636-7514

When a person is arrested, but not charged, or they enter a diversion agreement, their criminal record won’t show a conviction, but it will document the arrest and the details surrounding it. For some, especially those in political or professional positions, having even an arrest on their record is life-changing and can affect certain areas of their life, both vocationally and personally.

For this reason, many people choose to have their arrest records sealed. And the new Indiana Second Chance Law allows qualifying Hoosiers to do just that. Continue below to learn how you can determine your eligibility for record sealing, and where to get started.

Sealing an Arrest

Indiana arrest records can be sealed after one year from the date of the arrest. But keep in mind that there are more qualifications aside from the amount of time that has passed. If you are interested in sealing your arrest records, you can petition to do so at your local county clerks’ office. However, it is not recommended to file without professional assistance. The process of sealing arrest records is highly-complex and tedious. Just one clerical error or missed deadline can revoke your right to petition forever. You must retain the services of an experienced Indianapolis criminal attorney for helping with the filing and petition process. This will guarantee success in terms of proper filing.

Indianapolis Criminal Defense

David E. Lewis Criminal Defense Attorney

David E. Lewis Attorney at Law 317-636-7514

Call David E. Lewis, Attorney at Law at 317-636-7514 to seal arrest records in Indiana. He works around the clock to ensure your petition is carefully managed and filed in every aspect. And his services start as low as $850, so virtually anyone can afford to clear their criminal records or petty crimes and arrests. Call 317-636-7514 to schedule a free initial consultation with an Indianapolis criminal defense lawyer you can trust.

Can a Cop Be Fired for Excessive Use of a Taser?

Indiana Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

Indiana Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

Police officers are an incredible and significant line of defense for our cities and surrounding communities. But sometimes, just as any person in any vocation, cops can make poor choices that result in serious penalties. For instance, using their registered weapons inappropriately. While on-duty, cops are faced with the difficult decision to use their weapons for defense and public safety, including flashlights, nightsticks, Tasers, and of course, firearms.

And how the officer chooses to use their weapons greatly depends on the actions of the suspect or suspects. However, there have been cases where an officer is accused of using their weapons in excess, resulting in unreasonable injury to a person. In these kinds of cases, the question of reasonability commonly arises, as well as, the whether or not the officer should receive a penalty for their actions. One such question arose in the small town of Peru, Indiana, involving a cop, a taser, and an elderly nursing home patient. Continue reading to learn what happened.

PERU CITY POLICE DEPARTMENT and City of Peru v. Gregory MARTIN

No. 52A02–1304–PL–350. Decided: September 03, 2013

In 2012, a Peru City police officer by the name of Gregory Martin was dispatched to Miller’s Merry Manor after a call to 911 was made by a nurse named Adam Chambers. Chambers made the call to request assistance transporting a combative patient to the hospital. The patient was James Howard, a 64 year old Alzheimer’s patient. Upon arrival, Officer Martin was joined by Officer Jeremy Brindle, and they were then escorted to the locked Alzheimer’s ward section of the facility.

Indianapolis Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

Indianapolis Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

After asking staff to stay back and not intervene, the officers entered Mr. Howard’s room and found him sitting in a chair unclothed, and staring straight ahead. As the officers moved in closer, they ordered Mr. Howard to get on the gurney, but he did not obey the order. Instead, Mr. Howard began “shuffling” toward Officer Brindle with his fists clenched at his sides. Officer Brindle was cornered in a T-section hallway as he tried to grab Mr. Howard’s wrists and handcuff him. Unable to do so, Officer Martin then yelled, “Taser!” and deployed his onto Mr. Howard’s torso. Mr. Howard fell on the floor and laid on his back. He would still not comply with the officer’s commands, and turned over on his belly so he could not be handcuffed. As a result, Officer Martin ended up using the Taser on Mr. Howard 5 times, equaling a deployment of 31 seconds total.

After being admitted to the hospital, Mr. Howard’s injuries were documented, including a black eye, bruising, skin abrasions, and marks on his side. His wife was not pleased with the treatment he received by the officers on call. And for this, she filed a complaint with the Peru City Police Department for excessive use of a taser. An internal investigation followed, putting Officer Martin on administrative leave. The Peru City Police Chief, Chief Hoover, recommended Officer Martin’s termination after deciding he used excessive force with the Alzheimer’s patient. The City of Peru Board of Public Works and Safety conducted a hearing and agreed with Chief Hoover, so Officer Martin was discharged and sought review in the trial court.

After reviewing Officer Martin’s Taser training that specifically teaches that Taser exposure for over 15 seconds, whether due to multiple applications or a continuous one, increases the risk of death or serious injury. The panel concluded, “Substantial evidence supports the Board’s findings, and its decision to terminate Martin for use of excessive force and conduct unbecoming of an officer was not arbitrary and capricious.” He was fired.

Learn the Facts First

Criminal Defense Lawyer Indianapolis Indiana

Criminal Defense Lawyer 317-636-7514

When it comes to brushes with law enforcement, every situation is unique and requires a detailed look at the individual merits involved. For this reason, it is best to discuss your questions, concerns, and criminal charges with an experienced criminal defense attorney who can provide specific information regarding your individual circumstances. Contact David E. Lewis, Attorney at Law, at 317-636-7514 for experienced Indianapolis criminal defense you can trust.

Do I Have to Answer My Door if it’s the Police?

Indiana Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

Indiana Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

One of the most common questions received by criminal defense attorneys is, “Am I legally obligated to answer my door if it’s the police?” And it is actually a very good question. Answering the door doesn’t usually cause any sort of alarm for someone, but when it’s the cops knocking, many residents get paranoid. They are concerned that police have the legal right to barge into their home and begin searching for incriminating evidence against them if they open their door. They wonder whether or not opening their door to police allows officers to come inside without permission.

Unfortunately, the answer to these queries are not so cut and dry, but it is easy to understand. Continue reading to learn your rights to such privacy in Indiana, and what to do if you are confronted by law enforcement at your place of residence.

The Fourth Amendment

Every United States citizen has the right to a certain degree of privacy, as alluded to in our country’s constitution under the 4th Amendment, which reads “The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, [a] against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.SOURCE

The Right to Decline

Indiana Criminal Defense  317-636-7514

Indiana Criminal Defense 317-636-7514

Citizens, in most cases, have the right to legally decline to open the door for law enforcement, as well as, terminate their opportunity for entry (i.e. shut the door after answering it to prevent further communication). However, there are always exceptions to every rule. If law enforcement retains the proper documents, such as search or arrest warrants, they can enter a person’s home, even without permission.

The circumstances vary from case to case, which is why it is imperative to discuss your legal concerns with an experienced Indianapolis criminal defense lawyer. They have the knowledge, skills, and local resources to provide accurate answers and professional counsel you can trust.

How to React to Law Enforcement at Your Door

The best way to deal with law enforcement at your door is to simply answer it. If you are not aware of any crimes or charges against you, there should be nothing to worry about. Most often, if you are not suspected of a crime, police are simply in need of some neighborhood information, such as a missing person’s case, abandoned vehicles, and vacated apartment units. Otherwise, the police may believe you could be a witness to another person’s crime, and they need your help. If they do not have a warrant for your arrest, or to search your premises, you can shut the door and terminate your conversation at any time without legal recourse. As soon as the interaction is over, contact your defense attorney for further instructions. The police could be on their way back to the station to secure a warrant in some cases.

Indianapolis Criminal Defense

Criminal Defense Lawyer Indianapolis IN

Criminal Defense Lawyer 317-636-7514

Call Attorney David E. Lewis at 317-636-7514 for Indianapolis criminal defense you can trust. Our law firm offers free initial consultations to freely discuss the charges against you and the best strategies for defense. We will work around the clock to protect your rights and to preserve your freedoms. Call 317-636-7514 to get started today.

How Does Marion County’s Behavioral Health Court Work?

Indianapolis Criminal Defense 317-636-7514

Indianapolis Criminal Defense 317-636-7514

The Marion County Jail is packed. It is over-crowded, housing more than 900 inmates. And according to WFYI Indianapolis, more than 300 of those individuals suffer from mental health problems. In many cases, an inmate’s mental health issues were a leading factor in landing them behind bars, from drug and alcohol addiction, to bi-polar disorder, schizophrenia, and more.

Although the jail offers basic medication and treatment for offenders, the quality of care is not equal to the level of treatment they could be receiving at a dignified mental health rehabilitation center. Fortunately, Marion County officials have come to recognize that certain inmates truly need genuine mental health rehabilitation in addition to their sentences.

For this reason, the Marion County Court System has introduced an alternative type of court for offenders suffering from mental illness, and whose mental illness may have contributed to the crimes they’ve committed. This is called Marion County Behavioral Health Court, and is head by esteemed Judge, Barbara Crawford.

Eligibility

Not all individuals are eligible. But for those with an official diagnosis, they can choose to take their case through this alternative behavioral health court instead of the traditional system. It is a wise option for offenders facing serious charges for crimes they’ve committed because it gives them the opportunity to receive genuine behavioral and mental health treatment after they carry out their sentence. Each person who chooses this alternative court system is assigned a “recovery coach” after their sentence is complete.

With their recovery coaches, individuals will work through 5 phases to achieve better health:

1. Mandatory Court Appearances
2. Therapy
3. Compliance with Prescription Medication
4. Drug Testing
5. Additional Activities to Remain Focused on a Healthy, Rehabilitated Lifestyle

A recovery coach will be by their side to help them achieve these five phases and more. This gives them the knowledge, tools, and resources to transition from jail and back into real life. They get the assistance they need to become a productive and compliant part of society. So they receive their punishment, and then become a healthier, happier, and better person.

Indianapolis Criminal Defense

David E. Lewis Criminal Defense Attorney

David E. Lewis Attorney at Law 317-636-7514

Call David E. Lewis, Attorney at Law, at 317-636-7514 for Indianapolis criminal defense you can trust. Our law firm does everything in our power to protect your rights and preserve your freedoms. We offer free initial consultations to discuss your criminal charges and strategies for defense. Call 317-636-7514 to schedule yours today!

FAQS Regarding Indiana Handgun Appeals

Indianapolis Criminal Defense 317-636-7514

Indianapolis Criminal Defense 317-636-7514

Were you recently denied a permit to carry a concealed weapon in Indiana? If so, you probably have a lot of questions. Below you will find a list of the most frequently asked questions about Indiana handgun appeals and procedures.

Review each question for a better understanding of what to expect during your petition process. Talk to a trusted criminal defense attorney for help with your handgun permit appeal.

Do I Need a Lawyer to Appeal?

You are free to represent yourself when appealing a concealed carry permit denial. However, the law and legal process is often tricky. It takes acute knowledge and experience to know how to carefully navigate a handgun permit appeal. For this reason, it is best to hire a criminal defense lawyer for help filing your petition.

How Long Do I Have to Appeal My Permit Denial?

In Indiana, you have 60 days to file for an appeal if you are denied a concealed carry permit. Within this 60-day period, you must fill out and submit all the necessary documentation and paperwork, as well as, pay the fee required by the courts.

Can I Re-Apply If I Miss My 60-Day Window?

Yes, you can re-apply your appeal if you miss the initial 60-day time frame. Simply re-apply and pay the courts. If you previously paid a filing fee, the money will be refunded to you.

How Long Does the Process Take?

The amount of time it takes to complete the appeals process all depends on the complexity of the case. For easy appeals, an experienced criminal attorney can usually secure a permit within 60 to 90 days, sometimes sooner! However, for moderate to complex cases, it could takes several months and even up to a full year to complete.

What Do I Do if I Was Denied Because of a Mental Health Issue?

Unfortunately, these are often the most challenging cases to appeal. With all the recent cases of mass shooting, and the history of violent crime, law enforcement and governments are hesitant to grant carry permits to those officially diagnosed with a mental health disorder. Talk to a criminal attorney to discuss your options.

Are Federal and State Standards for Handgun Permits Different?

Yes; the standards for granting concealed carry handgun permits differ between state and federal levels. This means you might be approved for a state-level permit, but not approved for a federal level one.

Why Was I Denied a Permit After My Old One Expired?

A new software program is now used that retrospectively evaluates existing permit holders’ eligibility. Some permit holders are denied permit renewal or lifetime permits because of new evidence found on their permanent record.

Indianapolis Criminal Defense

David E. Lewis Attorney at Law

David E. Lewis Attorney at Law 317-636-7514

Call David E. Lewis, Attorney at Law, at 317-636-7514 for help appealing a concealed carry permit denial in Indiana. Based out of Indianapolis, his criminal defense law office is conveniently located and open Monday through Friday by appointment. We offer free initial consultations to discuss your criminal defense needs. Call 317-636-7514 to schedule your appointment with a licensed Indianapolis criminal defense lawyer you can trust.

Examples of Unlawful Search and Seizures

Indianapolis Criminal Defense 317-636-7514

Indianapolis Criminal Defense 317-636-7514

The Fourth Amendment of the United States Constitution gives citizens the right to be free of unlawful or unreasonable searches and seizures by law enforcement officials. In fact, this very search and seizure law is one of the trademarks of our country’s criminal justice system. It means that police and other forms of law enforcement must have a good reason to legally search a person or their property, as well as, seize personal belongings or make an arrest.

“Good reason” is established when police identify tangible evidence or facts that leads them to believe a person is committing, has committed, or intends to commit a crime. This is also referred to as probable cause. If sufficient probable cause is present during a police encounter in a place where privacy is not expected, a search and seizure is not deemed unreasonable, therefore, it is not illegal. Places where privacy is not expected include anything that is in plain view or public, such as the front seat of a car, disposed garbage, and public places.

Places where privacy is expected: private residence, hotel room, trunks of cars, luggage, and even a closed telephone booth. To help understand what is legal and what’s not, continue reading for some examples of unlawful search and seizures.

Traffic Violation Stop

Janet is pulled over for speeding. The officer learns that her license and suspended and she does not have auto insurance coverage for the vehicle. For this reason, he must have the car impounded. During a legal vehicle impound, an officer is allowed to conduct an inventory search of the contents of the vehicle. But the search must be conducted according to standard police regulations and procedures. The officer asks Janet to step out of her vehicle and stand in front of his squad car.

She exits her vehicle, taking her purse with her, and follows his orders. As she is standing in front of the police car holding her purse, the cop instructs her to place her purse in the trunk of her car instead. Now that the purse is in her vehicle, the police officer uses the opportunity to search the contents of her purse as part of the inventory search. As a result, he finds a small amount of marijuana in her purse, and then he arrests her on drug possession charges.

Later, the court finds that: 1) the search did not comply with the standard regulations for an inventory search, 2) the defendant had her purse outside of the vehicle when the officer instructed her to place it back inside, and 3) there was no evidence of criminal traffic violation, only standard traffic infractions. Since the courts ruled that the search was unlawful, the evidence found during the search was dismissed. And although the impounding and inventory search were legal, the search of her purse was not. So in the end, Janet was not charged with drug possession.

Noise Disturbance Call

Amy is fighting with her live-in boyfriend Dan. Neighbors call the police to report the noise. By the time the police arrive, Amy and Dan have calmed down and reconciled. They consent to letting the police inside their living room to discuss the calls from neighbors and to confirm that there isn’t a problem. The responding officers so not see anything illegal around the immediate areas of the apartment.

But as the couple is questioned by one officer, the other cop continues to search the rest of the apartment, opening cabinets and closet doors. In the back bedroom closet, the officer finds a stash of prescription-grade medication that is not prescribed to Amy or Dan. They seize the drugs and make the arrests.

Later, the courts find that the police officers unlawfully searched their home, so any evidence found during the unlawful search was dismissed. So neither Amy nor Dan was criminally charged. This is because law enforcement did not have a warrant to search the rest of their property. Cops could only make an arrest in this situation had they found evidence of a crime in plain sight. Law enforcement cannot open drawers and cabinets, search in closets, lift furniture, or implement an type of excessive search of a property without permission.

Call a Lawyer for Help

The laws surrounding our fourth amendment and search warrants is very complex, and differs from case to case. With so many details that can influence whether or not a search and seizure is lawful, it is important to consult an experienced criminal defense lawyer to learn your rights, as well as, the facts surrounding your case.

Indianapolis Criminal Defense

Criminal Defense Lawyer Indianapolis Indiana

Criminal Defense Lawyer 317-636-7514

Call David E. Lewis, Attorney at Law, at 317-636-7514 if you were recently searched and arrested by police, and you believe it was unreasonable or illegal. He offers aggressive Indianapolis criminal defense, and stops at nothing to protect your rights and preserve your freedoms. Our law firm offers free initial consultations to discuss your criminal charges and a strategy for defense. Call 317-636-7514 to schedule an appointment with an experienced criminal defense attorney in Indianapolis, IN today.

Reducing Criminal Charges With a Plea Bargain

Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

The main purpose of retaining legal counsel following an arrest is to avoid the maximum penalties for your criminal charges. In fact, reducing or dismissing criminal charges is the primary goal for you as the defendant, as well as your defense attorney. But in order to get charges reduces against their client, a knowledgeable and aggressive criminal lawyer must negotiate with the prosecution for an improved outcome in court.

A common method of accomplishing this feat is to use something called a plea bargain. But in order to use a plea bargain, it must first be approved by the courts. Continue reading to learn what a plea bargain is, what it is used for, and how it benefits both the prosecution and the defense.

Accepting a Plea

A plea bargain is an agreement between the prosecuting attorneys and your defense attorney in which each party must give something to take something, in terms of sentencing. Essentially, it is a compromise regarding a defendant’s charges and penalties for their crimes. In most cases, this means a defendant accepts to plead guilty to their crimes in return for a lower charge or more forgiving penalties. This can include reducing jail time, reducing felonies to misdemeanors, lesser fines, probation instead of jail, ankle monitoring in place of jail, ignition interlock devices, drug testing, and more. Here’s an example:

❝ Leonard was arrested for felony drug possession. His crime is a Level 6 Felony that faces up to 1 year in prison. Prosecution offers to give up their right to take the case to trial and sentence Leonard to the fullest if he will plead guilty to a Class A Misdemeanor or more lenient fines and penalties.❞

It is not up to the prosecution and defense to use a plea bargain. Instead, plea bargains must first be approved by the courts. A judge has to determine whether or not a defendant was strong-armed in any way; and once they confirm no pressure was made, they will approve a plea bargain. However, the process and regulations for plea bargains differ from state to state. Talk to your Indianapolis criminal defense attorney about Indiana plea bargains and procedures.

Indianapolis Criminal Defense

David E. Lewis Attorney at Law

David E. Lewis Attorney at Law 317-636-7514

Call David E. Lewis, Attorney at Law, at 317-636-7514 to discuss the right defense for your criminal charges in Indianapolis, Indiana. We offer free initial consultations to talk about your criminal charges, and determine the best strategy for defense. Attorney David E. Lewis works around the clock, fighting to reduce or dismiss your criminal charges. He stops at nothing to preserve your rights and protect your freedoms. Call 317-636-7514 to schedule a consultation with an aggressive Indianapolis criminal
defense lawyer
you can trust.

Can I Tape Record an On-Duty Police Officer?

Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

With the abundance of audio and video technology available today, most people are walking around with cameras and smart phones that have high-tech capabilities. And with the combination of free Wi-Fi and personal hot spot zones, they can easily and instantly share and upload their recordings from almost anywhere. Over the past few years, a popular use for personal recording devices has been to record police encounters.

As more and more police brutality stories are hitting the news, more and more citizens are becoming paranoid of cops using excessive force or unfair use of their authority. For this reason, many more people are choosing to audio tape their personal encounters with law enforcement, while many others are choosing to video record on-duty police interacting with other citizens or suspects.

Your Rights to Record

But does the law set limitations for this? Are people allowed to record and publicize on-duty police? Lately, this has been a hot topic among law enforcement, the American public, and the Supreme Court. Many people believe it is an obstruction of justice, and even dangerous, to tape record on-duty officers. They argue that the right to film could cause problems conducting sensitive investigations, securing crime scenes, and even discourage people from speaking honestly with cops.

For instance, a couple of years ago Illinois passed an eavesdropping bill that punished anyone who recorded an on-duty police officer in a public place without consent of all parties. The penalty for violators included a felony charge and up to 15 years in prison. This law was later found unconstitutional in a federal appeals court since it violated free speech rights. The opposition filed an appeal against this ruling, but the Supreme Court declined to hear it. This left the federal appeals court conclusions, binding. This means that it is LEGAL in all 50 states to record on-duty police officers in a public place (without consent) as long as it does not interfere with them doing their job.

Sending the Right Message

Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

Criminal Defense Attorney 317-636-7514

It is important to remember that the police brutality videos shared over the years are not an accurate representation of all police officers whatsoever. Every person is different, and the cops that chose the poor behaviors recorded in such videos are individuals acting out on their own personal emotions and agendas. Many times, law enforcement is unfairly publicized in a poor light, giving the impression that they have done something inappropriate when they have simply followed protocol.

It is important to know the difference, and to also appreciate and respect our city’s first line of defense.

On the other hand, the duty of law enforcement is to protect, not intimidate. So if you believe you were unfairly treated by a police officer, it is recommended to contact a criminal defense lawyer to learn your rights. Choose a lawyer with experience and a passion for justice. Choose Attorney David E. Lewis.

Indianapolis Criminal Defense

Criminal Defense Lawyer Indianapolis Indiana

Criminal Defense Lawyer 317-636-7514

Call Attorney David E. Lewis at 317-636-7514 to learn your rights following an arrest in Indianapolis, Indiana. Our criminal defense law firm works around the clock to protect your rights and preserve your freedoms. David E. Lewis, Attorney at Law, has decades of trial and litigation experience, and will stop at nothing to obtain a more favorable outcome to your criminal charges. Call 317-636-7514 to schedule a free initial consultation with an Indianapolis criminal defense attorney you can trust.