TL;DR: The U.S. operates under a system called federalism, where power is divided between the federal government and state governments. The Constitution defines which powers belong to each, and some powers are shared by both. This has real consequences in criminal law—including the possibility of being prosecuted by both the state and federal government for the same conduct.
Key Takeaways:
- Federalism divides governmental authority between the national and state governments
- The Supremacy Clause establishes that federal law overrides conflicting state law
- Enumerated powers belong exclusively to the federal government; reserved powers belong to the states
- Some powers—like taxation—are concurrent, meaning both levels of government share them
- The dual sovereignty doctrine allows both a state and the federal government to prosecute a defendant for the same conduct without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause
Table of Contents:
- The Constitutional Basis for Federalism
- Exclusive vs. Concurrent Powers: Who Governs What?
- Federalism and the Criminal Justice System
- How Dual Sovereignty Impacts Criminal Defense
- Frequently Asked Questions
- Quick Recap
- Conclusion
- Speak with a Criminal Lawyer Today

The Constitutional Basis for Federalism
The U.S. Constitution establishes federalism through several interconnected provisions that define the boundaries of national and state authority. According to the Legal Information Institute at Cornell Law School, federalism is “a system of government in which the same territory is controlled by two levels of government.” Under this framework, the U.S. Constitution has established a system of “dual sovereignty,” where states have surrendered many powers to the federal government—but have retained others.
Three constitutional provisions form the backbone of this arrangement:
The Supremacy Clause (Article VI) declares that the Constitution, and all laws made under it, are “the supreme law of the land.” This means that when federal and state laws conflict, federal law wins. The Supremacy Clause also underpins the doctrine of federal preemption—the principle that federal law can override state law in certain areas, either explicitly or by implication.
Article I, Section 8 lists Congress’s specific legislative powers, known as enumerated powers. These include the authority to coin money, regulate interstate commerce, establish post offices, declare war, and raise a military. Congress also holds the Necessary and Proper Clause, which grants it authority to pass all laws “necessary and proper” for carrying out its enumerated functions.
The Tenth Amendment reserves to the states—or to the people—all powers not delegated to the federal government. This reservation clause protects state authority over areas like education, public safety, local courts, and business regulation within state borders.
Together, these provisions create a layered system of governance that has been interpreted and refined through centuries of Supreme Court decisions. One landmark ruling, McCulloch v. Maryland (1819), established that Congress holds implied powers beyond its enumerated list. Chief Justice John Marshall held that “necessary” should be understood broadly—meaning “conducive to” or “appropriate and legitimate”—not strictly indispensable. His famous conclusion: “Let the end be legitimate, let it be within the scope of the constitution, and all means which are appropriate, which are plainly adapted to that end…are constitutional.”
Exclusive vs. Concurrent Powers: Who Governs What?
Powers under American federalism fall into three categories: those held exclusively by the federal government, those reserved for the states, and those shared by both.
Exclusive Federal Powers
These are powers only the national government can exercise. They include:
- Coining money and regulating currency
- Declaring war and maintaining a national military
- Regulating immigration and naturalization
- Establishing post offices
- Conducting foreign policy and ratifying treaties
States are explicitly prohibited from exercising these powers. Article I, Section 10 of the Constitution bars states from coining money, entering into treaties, or granting titles of nobility, among other things.
Reserved State Powers
Under the Tenth Amendment, states retain authority over matters of local concern. These reserved powers include:
- Establishing and overseeing school systems
- Creating public safety and law enforcement systems
- Regulating business and trade within state borders
- Managing state court systems
- Administering local government
Concurrent Powers
Some powers belong to both levels of government simultaneously. Concurrent powers include taxation, building roads, and creating lower courts. Both Congress and state legislatures can exercise these powers independently—though the Supremacy Clause applies if a conflict arises.
Federalism and the Criminal Justice System
Federalism directly shapes who prosecutes criminal offenses in the United States—and under some circumstances, the same conduct can trigger both state and federal charges.
Most criminal law in the United States originates at the state level. Crimes like assault, theft, murder, and drug possession are typically prosecuted under state statutes by state prosecutors. Each state maintains its own criminal code, court system, and sentencing guidelines.
Federal criminal jurisdiction is narrower but significant. Congress has authority to criminalize conduct that involves:
- Interstate commerce or activity crossing state lines (e.g., drug trafficking across state borders)
- Federal property or federal officials
- Violations of federal statutes (e.g., federal weapons charges, bank fraud, tax evasion)
- Activities governed by specific federal laws, such as immigration violations
Because federal and state criminal laws operate independently, a single act can sometimes violate both. A person caught carrying a firearm illegally may face charges under both state law and a separate federal firearms statute. Both prosecutions can proceed—and courts have consistently upheld this framework.
How Dual Sovereignty Impacts Criminal Defense
The dual sovereignty doctrine means that the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment does not bar successive prosecutions by separate sovereigns—a ruling the Supreme Court reaffirmed in Gamble v. United States (2019).
The Double Jeopardy Clause states that no person shall be “twice put in jeopardy…for the same offence.” Many defendants assume this protection prevents both state and federal governments from prosecuting them for the same conduct. This assumption is wrong.
In Gamble v. United States, the Supreme Court declined to overturn the dual sovereignty doctrine in a 7–2 decision authored by Justice Samuel Alito. The Court clarified that the doctrine is not an exception to the right against double jeopardy—it is a corollary to the text of the Fifth Amendment itself. Because an “offence” is defined by law, and laws are created by a sovereign, conduct that violates both a state law and a federal law constitutes two separate offenses under two separate sovereigns.
The practical result: a defendant acquitted under state law can still face federal prosecution for the same underlying conduct, and vice versa.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Neil Gorsuch dissented. Justice Gorsuch warned that the doctrine “endorses a colossal exception to this ancient rule against double jeopardy” and that it “appears nowhere in the text of the Fifth Amendment.” These dissents signal ongoing tension around this doctrine—but it remains binding law.
For anyone facing criminal charges, understanding how federal and state jurisdictions interact can be the difference between a manageable outcome and a devastating one.
Frequently Asked Questions About Federalism
Can a state law contradict federal law?
Technically, yes—states can pass laws that conflict with federal statutes. However, under the Supremacy Clause, federal law takes precedence when a genuine conflict exists. State laws that directly contradict federal law can be struck down through the doctrine of federal preemption.
What are implied powers, and why do they matter?
Implied powers are federal authorities not explicitly listed in the Constitution but recognized through the Necessary and Proper Clause. The McCulloch v. Maryland ruling established that Congress can use any means “appropriate and legitimate” to carry out its enumerated functions. This has allowed federal authority to expand significantly over time.
Can I be prosecuted by both the state and federal government for the same crime?
Yes. Under the dual sovereignty doctrine affirmed in Gamble v. United States (2019), both a state government and the federal government can prosecute you for the same conduct without violating the Double Jeopardy Clause, because each prosecution is brought by a separate sovereign under separate laws.
What is federal preemption?
Federal preemption occurs when a federal law overrides or displaces a state law in the same subject area. Preemption can be explicit (clearly stated in the federal statute) or implied (inferred from congressional intent or the scope of federal regulation).
Which court handles federal criminal cases?
Federal criminal cases are heard in U.S. District Courts, which are the trial-level courts of the federal judiciary. State criminal cases are handled in state trial courts. Appeals follow separate tracks—federal convictions are appealed through the federal circuit courts, while state convictions move through state appellate courts.
Quick Recap: Key Facts to Remember
- Federalism divides governing authority between the national government and the states
- The Supremacy Clause (Article VI) makes federal law the “supreme law of the land”
- Article I, Section 8 lists Congress’s enumerated powers; the Necessary and Proper Clause extends these through implied powers
- The Tenth Amendment reserves powers not delegated to the federal government to the states
- Concurrent powers (e.g., taxation, road-building) are shared by both levels of government
- Most criminal law is state law, but federal criminal jurisdiction covers interstate activity, federal property, and specific federal statutes
- The dual sovereignty doctrine, reaffirmed in Gamble v. United States (2019), allows both state and federal prosecution for the same conduct without violating Double Jeopardy protections
Federalism Has Real Consequences—Especially in Criminal Court
Understanding how power is divided between state and federal governments is not just an academic exercise. For individuals facing criminal charges, it shapes who prosecutes you, which laws apply, and what protections you can invoke. The dual sovereignty doctrine, in particular, means that a state outcome—whether acquittal or conviction—does not necessarily end your legal exposure.
If you or someone you know is facing criminal charges in Indiana, getting informed legal counsel early is critical. Schedule a free criminal case review with our criminal defense lawyers in Indianapolis today. Our team can help you understand whether federal jurisdiction applies to your case, evaluate your exposure under both state and federal law, and build the strongest possible defense on your behalf.
Related Post: The United States Constitution Made Easy: A Beginner’s Guide








